« | Main | »

Many issues to choose from 2008

I like this post from Jinx of I am only one... so much that I'm reproducing the whole thing here:

In tackling the problems facing our world right now, there's plenty of work to go around, and the efforts are not harmed by some specialization.  If I am talking about gender issues and you are focussed on racial bias --- or if I am talking about education and you are talking about environment --- we are not enemies.  There are enough of us to work on many fronts at once; there are enough fronts to keep all of us busy.  We can cooperate; we can each work on the issue that most stirs our energy at the moment; we can still understand that we are allies in making things better.

If we begin to fight each other over which is the single most important problem, we are wasting energy that could be used to address various problems.  We are also helping those who don't want to acknowledge the problems and don't want to see them solved.

Two very common arguments that serve the purpose of not solving problems are these:

(1)  If the person trying to address the issue is a member of the community (or nation) where the problem exists, the line is "How can you be so disloyal as to attack and criticize your own people."  If the person trying to help is not from the same community/nation, the line is "You are an outsider, you don't belong here, what business is it of yours, why don't you go work on what's wrong in your own home."

(2)  Regardless of whether the problem-solvers are local or not, the line is "How can you even talk about [this problem] when you haven't said anything about [some other problem]." 

Variations of these two arguments show up repeatedly.  They are virtually always distractions from the attempt to solve the problem, though often those who use them aren't consciously aware of that intention.   A good answer may be to describe the solution we're trying to achieve and ask, "Can you agree that it would be better if we achieved this change?  if it would be better, why fight over who helps to make it better?  why say that some other unrelated problem has to be solved before we can work on this one?"

(The original is here if you want to comment).

 

Posted on February 26, 2008 at 03:43 PM in warnings & kvetches | Permalink

Comments

Wow, thank you very much!

Posted by: Jinx at Feb 26, 2008 7:40:09 PM

You can't turn Sweeny Todd into Annie, but all it takes to do the reverse is give Ms. Hannigan and Rooster a few really sharp knives.

- Peter, Peter's Files of Comedy, Satire, Jokes, Commentary and Videos
Http://ThePeterFiles.blogspot.com

I should know, I've been in both plays. Played both Daddy Warbucks who was crazy about Annie, and then bedlam inmates who were just crazy. Though I have to say, that musically, Sondheim's Sweeny was a lot more satisfying with the possible exception of listening to the 25 Orphans sing "Its a hard knock life" and the fact that as Warbucks I had all those solos.


Posted by: Peter, Peter's Blog of Comedy, Satire, Jokes, Commentary and Videos at Mar 17, 2008 4:55:18 AM

Post a comment






« | Main | »

Blog (noun) A weblog or similar brief journal usually containing links and commentary thereon. Term coined by Peter Merholz.
Visit Typepad or Blogger to start your own. (I began with hand coding, then switched to Blogger when it first became available, then to Movable Type when I wanted more control over my weblog and to have it hosted at a place of my choosing (Hurricane Electric). Now I use Typepad, built by the same folks who made Movable Type and I love it).

You may write to Dinah @ this domain.

Except where otherwise noted all text is copyright 1965-2006 Dinah Sanders. Images are copyright of their original creators. MetaGrrrl logo and photos of and by Dinah are copyright 1998-2006 Dinah Sanders. Inkspot Books and the Inkspot logo have been Service Marks of Dinah Sanders since 1993. Publication (yes, including on the web) without express written permission prohibited.